You are being redirected to the new website citiesonvolcanoes11.com



Heraklion, Crete, June 12-17, 2022 Hybrid Format 

Symposium 2

Physical Sciences

Click on a Symposium title for details

S2.1 > Volcanoes under pressure: monitoring and biotechnology

Conveners

Paraskevi N. Polymenakou

Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Gournes Pediados, Heraklion, Crete, Greece

polymen@hcmr.gr


Antonis Magoulas

Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Gournes Pediados, Heraklion, Crete, Greece

magoulas@hcmr.gr

Life can be found everywhere on Earth, evolving ways to survive even at the strangest and most inhospitable places such as the volcanic systems. Studying microbes and finding how they can live at volcanoes can help us set the boundaries of life on Earth and get more insights into microbial survival strategies. Microbial monitoring of volcanoes can provide significant genetic and genomic information with potential biotechnological applications. Despite the vast possibilities of environmental biotechnology in providing goods and services to society, only a small fraction of the enormous biodiversity at the extreme habitats of volcanic systems has been explored to date. The aim of this session is to bring together scientists who work on microbial genomic monitoring of volcanic sites in order to understand the benefits of microbial volcanic exploration and exploitation to society. We particularly encourage submissions of presentations that are related to monitoring work of volcanic sites by using -omics technologies (e.g., genomics, metagenomics, metabolomics) and cultivation-based approaches.

Core connection between the proposed session and societal risk mitigation: The aim of this session is to bring together scientists who work on microbial genomic monitoring of volcanic sites in order to understand the benefits that can bring the microbial volcanic exploration and exploitation to society.

S2.2 > Towards innovative models describing the complex mechanics of debris flows and lahars

Conveners

Fabio Dioguardi

British Geological Survey, The Lyell Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

fabiod@bgs.ac.uk

Lizeth Caballero

Science Faculty, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico

lcaballero@ciencias.unam.mx

Damiano Sarocchi

Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, Mexico

sarocchi@gmail.com




Roberto Sulpizio

Universitá degli Studi di Bari “Aldo Moro”, Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e Geoambientali, Bari, Italy

roberto.sulpizio@uniba.it



Debris flows and lahars are multi-phase mixtures made of variable amounts and types of sediment and water. They can be triggered by a variety of processes, like the interaction of explosive volcanic eruptions with a source of water (e.g. crater lake or a glacier), prolonged and intense rainfall remobilizing loose sediments among others. They flow downslope due to gravity and are characterized by a high bulk density and complex particle interactions which explain their capability of transporting large blocks and debris and exerting significant dynamic impact on building and infrastructures.The intrinsic complexity of the physical processes taking place in these flows has been addressed through different approaches with little or no interaction between them. These include fieldwork, real-time measurements (monitoring), experiments (from laboratory to large scale) and numerical modelling. Bringing them together has the potential to lead to a better understanding of the fluid dynamics and eventually improving the constitutive equations and initial and boundary conditions required for predictive simulations. Simulation tools, in turn, are fundamental for assessing the hazard related to these processes. In this session we welcome contributions presenting results from applications of the different approaches described above. We particularly encourage multidisciplinary contributions, e.g. combination of experiments and modelling or exposure and vulnerability analyses for risk assessment. To integrate and discuss multiple sources of information will summarize the challenges still needed in improving our current knowledge of these phenomena and will extend networks focused on designing new and more accurate models for hazard assessment and mitigation strategies. 

Core connection between the proposed session and societal risk mitigation:Understanding the physics of debris flows and lahars is of paramount importance for improving our capability to predict the impact of these flows on the environment and human society and then mitigate their hazard.

S2.3 > Looking at eruptive style transitions and patterns of cyclicity in volcanic activity

Conveners

Silvia Massaro

Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Bologna, Italy

Sylvain Charbonnier

University of South Florida, School of Geosciences, Tampa, United States of America

Eruptive style transitions and pattern of cyclicity in eruptive activity have become among the main challenging topics in present-day volcanological research. This is because their understanding is relevant for both physical description of volcanic phenomena and hazard mitigation plans. Complex eruptive cycles and alternating eruptive styles have been frequently observed inmost volcanoes worldwide, but they are far from being fully understood. In the last few years, new efforts have been devoted to better constrain some physical variables controlling changes in eruption dynamics (i.e. changes in local and far field stress, geometrical evolution of the conduit feeding system). In addition, many magmatic/volcanic processes can also be characterized by patterns of cyclicity during both effusive and explosive eruptions. These include variations in lava effusion rates, gas flux, ground deformation, seismicity as well as any temporal change in the properties of the magma-chamber-conduit system. For this reason, analyzing and modeling these patterns during volcanic activity is fundamental to understand eruptive dynamics and to evaluate current hazards and future scenarios. In this session, we encourage contributions focused on evidence of both eruptive style transitions and increasing, decreasing, stationary,and cyclic eruptive activity, collected by using either single parameter or multi-parametric approaches. The combination of field data, ground-and satellite-based measurements, and numerical modeling are welcome, with special emphasis to the correlation between internal processes, occurring inside the volcano plumbing system, and external phenomena, observed at/above the vent.

S2.5 > Rates and dates: magmatic and volcanic processes from source to surface

Conveners

Katie Preece

Swansea University, United Kingdom

k.j.preece@swansea.ac.uk

Ralf Gertisser

Keele University, United Kingdom

r.gertisser@keele.ac.uk


Heather Handley

Macquarie University, Australia


Chiara Petrone

The Natural History Museum, United Kingdom

C.Petrone@nhm.ac.uk

Darren Mark

Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom

Timescales of magmatic processes and eruptive histories are fundamental pieces of information required for understanding magmatic systems, and which can contribute to improve short- and long-term eruption forecasting. For example, timescales and rates of crystallisation, degassing and magma ascent are crucial for understanding magma residence, magmatic differentiation, and the driving forces leading to eruption. Knowledge about timing and frequency of past eruptions is essential for accurate hazard assessment, as well as for understanding long-term magmatic evolution at a volcano. Current development of novel methods, and continued advances in existing analytical and imaging techniques mean that elements, isotopes and rock textures can be measured and analysed at ever improving precision and spatial resolution. We encourage contributions which investigate magmatic timescales and volcanic histories, using a range of techniques including but not limited to, geochronology and radioisotopic dating, uranium-series isotopic analysis, field studies, diffusion modelling and quantitative textural studies.

S2.6 > Uncertainty quantification in volcanic phenomena: an essential component for modeling physical processes and for hazard/risk assessment

Conveners

Alessandro Tadini

Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans, Université Clermont Auvergne, Aubiere Cedex, France

Andrea Bevilacqua

Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Pisa, Italy



Pablo Tierz

British Geological Survey, The Lyell Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Mary Grace Bato

NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States of America

Sebastien Biasse

Earth Observatory of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

Gabrielle Tepp

U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Volcano Observatory, Anchorage, AK, USA



Samantha Engwell

British Geological Survey, The Lyell Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom



Volcanic phenomena are affected by a high degree of uncertainty, both epistemic (i.e. related to incomplete knowledge of the phenomena themselves)and aleatoric (i.e. linked to the physical variability typical of complex natural systems). Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a fundamental task in hazard and risk assessment (e.g. for emergency management and long-term planning)and is essential for making advances in modeling physical processes. UQ has a significant effect on the solution to many different problems in volcanology, both the inverse problems aimed at the reconstruction of past events and the forward problems aimed at the forecasts of future events. 

These problems include:

  • The calculation of eruptive parameters, such as the mass of different volcanicphenomena (fallout, PDC, etc.), the mass flow rate at the eruptive vent/fissure,and the maximum or average plume height. The uncertainty in this case definesthe probability density function of input parameters to the models of volcanicprocesses.
  • The definition of the behavior of the volcano, including the spatial location oferuptive vents, the temporal estimates of eruption onset and duration, and theprobability of different eruptive styles and/or hazardous phenomena.
  • The modeling of volcanic phenomena, especially in those approaches wheregreat simplifications have been introduced to allow the reduction of computationaltimes (e.g. 1-D integral plume models; Gaussian Tephra transport and dispersalmodels; kinetic, integral, or depth-averaged mass flow models). UQ is inthis case crucial to define the limits and the advantages of each model, throughthe comparison with past data.

UQ can be performed with different approaches, including the application of expert judgement techniques, the comparison of different sampling/integration techniques for measuring field data, the employment of different multi-model procedures and modeling benchmarks for numerical simulations, stochastic processes, event trees,and Bayesian networks. In this session we welcome contributions that cover this wide spectrum of UQ of volcanic phenomena, with a specific focus on those studies focused on modeling of physical processes and/or those which provide a direct application of the results to hazard/risk assessments (e.g. hazard or risk maps obtained through approaches that consider all the above mentioned problems).

S2.8 > Source to surface magma transport at small-volume intraplate basaltic volcanoes

Conveners

Heather Handley

Macquarie University, Australia

heather.handley@mq.edu.au

Károly Németh

Massey University, New Zealand

K.Nemeth@massey.ac.nz

Hugo Murcia

Universidad de Caldas, Colombia

hugo.murcia@ucaldas.edu.co


Understanding the sub-volcanic journey of magma from mantle source tosurface in small-volume basaltic volcanic fields is critical for improved assessmentof volcanic hazards. Magma transport pathways from the mantle may be directand rapid, or more complex, involving storage and evolution and so providegreater warning time of an eruption. In this session we welcome contributionsthat unravel the pathways, dynamics and timescales of magma ascent at smallvolumecontinental basaltic ‘monogenetic’ and ‘polygenetic’ volcanoes. Thesession covers studies utilising but not limited to: field relations in exposedplumbing systems, geophysical imaging, paleomagnetism, the petrography andmineralogy of erupted rocks and associated xenoliths, whole-rock geochemistryand isotopes. We welcome contributions at the scale of single-volcanic centresto field-wide studies.

S2.9 > Magma fragmentation: primary volcanic deposits, their clasts, experiments and models, and an open discussion

Conveners

Pierre-Simon Ross

Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Québec, Canada

rossps@ete.inrs.ca

James D.L. White

Geology Department, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

james.white@otago.ac.nz

Lucia Gurioli

Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, IRD, OPGC, Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans, Clermont-Ferrand, France

lucia.gurioli@uca.fr

Tobias Dürig

Geology Department, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

tobias.durig@otago.ac.nz

Bettina Scheu

Department für Geo- und Umweltwissenschaften, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), München, Germany

b.scheu@lmu.de

Magma fragmentation is a fundamental process of volcanism, and its mechanisms have important hazards implications for active volcanoes and monogenetic volcanic fields, since some eruptive styles are more dangerous than others to humans and infrastructure. Learning about magma fragmentation mechanisms for unwitnessed eruptions (and even witnessed ones) builds understanding of eruptive energy partitioning, and helps build a picture of “what this volcano (or volcanic field) can do”, supporting risk mitigation.This special session aims to bring together scientists working on magma fragmentation processes – and the state of the magma before fragmentation in all environments and from all different perspectives. This includes the study of primary volcaniclastic deposits on land or in water, with particular focus on juvenile clasts (particle density, shapes, surface features and internal textures),all relevant laboratory experiments, and physical models for fragmentation.

S2.10 > Extant and extinct shallow submarine hydrothermal geobiology laboratories and ore-forming systems in volcanic-arcs

Conveners

Stephanos Kilias

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

kilias@geol.uoa.gr

Jonathan Naden

British Geological Survey, United Kingdom

jna@bgs.ac.uk


Ernest Chi Fru

School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, United Kingdom

         ChiFruE@cardiff.ac.uk



Magnus Ivarsson

Department of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark / Department of Palaeobiology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Sweden

magnus.ivarsson@nrm.se



Modern and fossil geothermal systems associated with shallow submarine and emergent arc-volcanoes constitute sources of seawater acidity, energy donors for marine microbial communities and, analogues for ore-forming systems that have produced minable metal deposits; these attributes result from a complex and dynamic interplay between geothermal, metallogenic, biological and volcanotectonic processes. The Aegean is a world renown type locality for interdisciplinary data derived from such systems associated with shallow submarine (<500m) (Kolumbo, Santorini) and submarine-to-subaerial (Milos) components of the Aegean Volcanic Arc (HVA), S. Aegean Sea, Greece. Actively forming polymetallic seafloor massive sulfide mineralization at Kolumbo, is enrichedin critical metals/metalloids (Sb, Tl, Hg, As, Au, Ag, Zn) and exemplifies mineralization across the submarine-subaerial transition, whereas at Milosthis style of mineralization has been uplifted and preserved intact providing on-land analogue of hybrid epithermal-to-VMS mineralization. Milos hosts the first identified <1 Ma biogenic fossiliferous sedimentary iron formation comparable to Precambrian banded iron formations (BIFs); Santorini caldera,may constitute potential analogue for geobiological formation mechanisms of Fe-rich chemical sediments in the Precambrian rock record. Ore-grade Mn-Ba beds, associated with the Milos IF, typify Microbially Induced Sedimentary Structures formed due to interaction of littoral sedimentation, white smokers and active photosynthetic and/or chemotrophic microbial activity. We welcome contributions from the Aegean or elsewhere, related to the implications of such systems for understanding ocean acidification and CO2< leakage and benthic accumulations from subsea carbon capture and storage sites, Fe-Mn biomineralization, submarine metallogenesis, volcanic hazard preparedness, and submerged metal and critical raw material resource potential.

S2.12 > Pre-eruptive magmatic processes and their timescales: how to utilize them for the mitigation of volcanic risk?

Conveners

Eugenio Nicotra

Università della Calabria, Italy

Paraskevi Nomikou

Department of Geology and Geoenvironment, NKUA, Athens, Greece

Volcanoes are among the most important natural hazards able to produce serious consequences to human habitats and large-scale economies. A global understanding of how magmatic processes work prior to eruption plays a fundamental role in the assessment of volcanic hazard and the mitigation of potential risk. During the last two decades, the advancement in volcanic monitoring networks,together with the development of more precise and accessible analytical techniques, have led to better constraints on the physical and chemical processes affecting magmas en route to the surface (i.e., storage/crystallization conditions, contamination, mixing, degassing). Great advances in the calculation of timescales of pre- and syn-eruptive processes have brought new insight into the mechanisms and durations of magma residence and ascent throughout the lithosphere. Nonetheless, a great point of discussion is still related to how this knowledge can contribute to the definition of plans of mitigation of volcanic risk,also in terms of highlighting of eruptive precursors.We invite submissions related to field and experimental volcanology, petrology,and geochemistry, that contribute to improve our current knowledge on magma dynamics and pre-eruptive timescales, and explore how these results can be linked with other disciplines and/or technologies, in terms of mitigation of volcanic risk.

S2.13 > Interdisciplinary reconstructions of the impact of past volcanic eruptions on climate and society

Conveners

Celine Vidal

University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

cv325@cam.ac.uk

Karen Holmberg

New York University, New York, NY, United States of America


Thomas Aubry

University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

         ta460@cam.ac.uk


Felix Riede

University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark

         f.riede@cas.au.dk


Volcanic eruptions can affect climate and societies over a range of spatial and temporal scales. Understanding the impact of past eruptions is critical for the assessment and mitigation of future volcanic risk. Reconstructing past eruption impacts requires interdisciplinary approaches at the intersection of geology, history, archaeology, dendrochronology, ice-core and climate science. Combining methods from multiple disciplines provides a more detailed understanding of the number, timing, circumstances, and impact of eruptions. This multidisciplinary approach is critical in regions lacking eruption chronologies, but can also yield important insights even at volcanoes with highly constrained eruption histories. At any volcano, such information is fundamental to appropriately assess its hazards.Given the uncertainties in observations, paleoclimate estimates, and model simulations,this session aims to provide a multidisciplinary interface to discuss director indirect causal relationships between the timing and magnitude of volcanic eruptions and climate variability and societal events. Under the remit of the PAGES (Past Global Changes) Volcanic Impacts on Climate and Society (VICS) Working Group, we invite presentations of state-of-the-art results on volcanic impacts on climate and society, combining methods using ice-core, tree-ring, geological, historical and/or archaeological records. We hope to discover and discuss new results on the history, archaeology and anthropology of direct or indirect climatically mediated consequences on past human societies.This proposal is endorsed by the Volcanic Impact on Climate and Society (VICS) working group from PAGES.Core connection between the proposed session and societal risk mitigation: This session focuses on the reconstruction of the impact of past volcanic eruptions on climate and society using multidisciplinary methods. Major explosive eruptions (>VEI 5) have occurred during the Quaternary on a frequency and magnitude (e.g., Toba super-eruption) far beyond the range of contemporary human experience. Studying the impacts of such eruptions in climate model simulations, as well as examining the fingerprints of such eruptions in geologic deposits (e.g., ice cores) and proxy records (e.g., tree-rings and others) provides valuable insight into the likelihood and consequences of this major geological and climatic hazard.

S2.15 > The Role of Tectonics on the Emergence and Evolution of Volcanic Features

Conveners

Dimitrios Papanikolaou

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

dpapan@geol.uoa.gr

Alessandro Tibaldi

University of Milan-Bicocca, Italy

alessandro.tibaldi@unimib.it


Christian Huebscher

University of Hamburg, Germany

christian.huebscher@uni-hamburg.de

Volcanism is related to the plate tectonics geodynamic processes, usually occurring along divergent plate boundaries or within back-arc basins of converging boundaries above subduction zones. In most cases, the volcanic features appear within tectonic grabens, forming rift zones of the upper crust,both onshore and offshore. Thus, volcanoes may be aligned along tectonic trends,indicating the intermediate stress axis of the dominant extensional field along the rift zone. More rarely, strike-slip fault zones may also control volcanism, with more complex relationships between volcanic features and tectonic stress orientation. The evolution of the tectonic structures may control the evolution of the successive volcanic centres as well as their geometry. The opening and deepening of the rift zones in marine basins is accompanied by the appropriate growth of the volcanism and its volcanic relief, driving to the emergence of volcanic islands. The migration of the volcanic activity to another rift zone may follow the overall migration of the convergent boundary within a geological time-frame of several millions of years, depending on the rate of subduction and subsequent deformation in the back-arc area. The relation between tectonics and volcanism can be studied both in active volcanic areas as well as in older,eroded volcanic successions. The overall volcanic evolution can be studied against the tectono-sedimentary evolution of the hosting basin with comparison of slip rates of synsedimentary faulting and sedimentation rates throughout the basin’s evolution. In this session, worldwide examples of the above relations in active or ancient volcanic areas may be presented and discussed.

S2.16 > What do volcano seismo-acoustic signals mean?

Conveners

Társilo Girona

Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Alaska, United States of America

tarsilo.girona@alaska.edu

Arthur Jolly

GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand

A.Jolly@gns.cri.nz

Philippe Lesage

Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IRD, IFSTTAR, ISTerre, Chambéry, France

lesage@univ-smb.fr

Robin Matoza

Department of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, United States of America

         matoza@geol.ucsb.edu

Connecting seismic and acoustic signals recorded around volcanoes to subsurface and subaerial processes is crucial for improving monitoring, as well as for eruption forecasting and characterization. In particular, combining seismic and acoustic data with theoretical, numerical, conceptual, and probabilistic models has become essential to identify repetitive patterns, the opening of fractures and cracks beneath the surface, the transfer of magma through the crust and shallow subsurface, the accumulation of gases beneath volcanic craters, eruptive activity of varied styles, surficial mass movements, or the sensitivity of volcanoes to external forces (e.g., far-field earthquakes, tidal stresses). In this session,we invite contributions focused on the study of seismic and/or acoustic signals around volcanoes and the robust interpretation of these signals. We encourage presentations that combine seismic and/or acoustic data with other observables, data science, and cutting-edge modeling techniques aiming to shed light on new monitoring strategies to better forecast the onset, duration, intensity, and end of volcanic events.

S2.17 > Time after Time

Conveners

Helena Albert

Central Geophysical Observatory (IGN), Madrid, Spain

halbert@fomento.es

Társilo Girona

Geophysical Institute University of Alaska Fairbanks Alaska, United States of America

tarsilo.girona@alaska.edu

Unraveling the timescales at which magmatic processes take place at depth prior to eruption is crucial to improve the interpretation of monitoring data. In particular, the combination of petrological and geochemical analyses with monitoring data has become an essential working strategy to understand the reactivation of magmatic plumbing systems, and therefore to improve the interpretation of the eruption precursors and potentially improve the forecasting of volcanic activity. In this session, we invite contributions focused on the timescales of magmatic processes and the evolution of plumbing systems,especially proposing a timeline of the magmatic system evolution. We encourage presentations connecting processes at depth to ground-based and satellite-based monitoring data, including but not limited to seismicity, deformation, gas and heat emissions.

S2.18 > Linking remote and local monitoring data through physical volcano models to understand and forecast unrest

Conveners

Paul Lundgren

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, CA, United States of America

paul.lundgren@jpl.nasa.gov

Kevin Reath

Cornell Engineering, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America

kar287@cornell.edu

Társilo Girona

Geophysical Institute University of Alaska Fairbanks Alaska, United States of America

tarsilo.girona@alaska.edu

Mary Grace Bato

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, CA, United States of America


Understanding volcanic systems and predicting their behavior through volcanophysical models constrained by in-situ and remotely sensed data is an area of increasing importance as the amount of data available grows. Ground-based monitoring data form the backbone of volcano monitoring, yet many volcanoes are poorly instrumented and/or the instrumental network is too sparse. On the other hand, space-based instruments offer complementary information thanks to their spatial resolution, broad coverage, and global reach, yet remain discrete in time. As remotely sensed data grow, particularly satellite multi-spectral and interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR), the potential to constrain active magma sources, identify physical processes, and forecast volcanic behavior increases. When possible, combining both local and remote monitoring observations greatly increase our ability to advance scientific understanding and improve volcano monitoring. In particular, combinations of time series from satellite remote sensing observations (e.g., thermal infrared, TIR; visible-short-wavelength infrared, VSWIR; ultraviolet, UV; InSAR) with in-situ observations (e.g., seismic; gravity; Global Navigation Satellite System, GNSS; tilt meter) are proving increasingly relevant to test physical models of magmatic systems. When combined with model parameter estimation methods (e.g. Bayesian inference; Ensemble Kalman Filter), volcano system parameter forecasting on time-scales relevant to observatories become increasingly possible. In this session, we invite contributions focusing on the observations of unrest, eruptions, and longer-term volcanic processes, as well as contributions demonstrating the implementation of analytical, experimental, and numerical models to gain understanding of volcanic system physics towards improving hazard mitigation.Core connection between session and societal risk mitigation: Remote sensing satellite data (multi-spectral, InSAR) are increasingly being combined with in-situ data (if they exist) to improve both tracking unrest and constraining physical volcano models which have the potential to inform decision makers regarding eruption forecasts.

S2.19 > New perspectives on geothermal energy exploration and evaluation ofgeothermal potential in volcanic environments

Conveners

Renato Somma

Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia Sez. Napoli, Italy

renato.somma@ingv.it

Claudia Cannatelli

CEGA (Andean Geothermal Center of Excellence) Universidad de Chile, Chile)

ccannatelli@ing.uchile.cl

Daniela Blessent

Department of Environmental Engineering, Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia

dblessent@udem.edu.co

Jasmin Raimond

Istitut National de la Recherche Scientifique INRS Québec), Canada

jasmin.raymond@ete.inrs.ca

During the past decade, strong efforts made to unravel the linkage between numerous volcanic areas, throughout the world, and their geothermal energy resources have posed the base to convert volcanic risk into a potential clean energy resource. Volcanic geothermal systems are uniquely defined by specific combinations of tectonic environment and volcanic structure. In recognition of these conditions, development of robust interdisciplinary perspective of such geothermal systems from a volcanological, geophysical, geochemical and geo(hydro)thermal point of view is fundamental. We welcome contributions pertaining to all of these disciplines in order to quickly locate areas within volcanic fields that are most likely to contain exploitable hydrothermal systems. In addition, volcanoes and their products may be seen as initial windows to subsurface conditions, such as thermal regime and lithology; this information can greatly reduce errors involved in constraining the geothermal potential of different areas worldwide.