Call for Papers
> The Paper Submission Deadline ends on August 31st, 2020
Authors of accepted abstracts may now submit their full papers to the conference.
The paper must be prepared in accordance with the official EuroSun 2020 template, not exceeding 12 pages, and uploaded as both a .docx and a .pdf file in the paper submission form.
All full papers presented at the conference will be peer-reviewed for publication in the proceedings, which will be published in the ISES Conference Proceedings Database, a publicly accessible and searchable online database. All papers accepted for publication by ISES will be assigned an individual DOI and be published by ISES under the title ISES EuroSun 2020 Proceedings.
Call for Abstracts
> The Abstract Submission Deadline ended on June 1st, 2020
Abstract were submitted on the following topics:
All presenting authors should register to the conference. The registration fees entitles an author to submit and present one abstract. For every additional abstract, a €50 fee will be requested upon acceptance.
Review Process
Abstracts will be reviewed by a least three (3) designated Scientific Committee reviewers. The reviewers will not have access to submitting author or co-authors’ details and will therefore not know the origins of the abstract to promote impartiality.
Authors will receive notification via e-mail regarding acceptance of abstracts by 01 July 2020.
Deadline for submission of full papers is 31 August 2020.
Authors should be aware that accepted papers and posters may be organized in various ways during the conference.
Abstract Review Criteria
The review criteria for abstracts are as follows:
Suitability for the topic. Does the abstract fit into the topic? Abstracts with inappropriate contents or commercial advertisements will be rejected.
Quality of research goals. Appropriately chosen and documented methods, logical presentation and analysis of results, findings, inferences and conclusions. Novelty and significance of the work, and implications for practices, policies or further research.
Only those abstracts that document significant results will be considered for oral presentations, in order to avoid a situation in which the "promises of the abstracts" cannot be fulfilled.
Standard of writing, clear and logical presentation, appropriate style, lack of errors, ease of reading, correct grammar and spelling, conformance with specifications for length and format details.